Stop Obsessing About Typos—Your Users Need Help
Posted on 22. Apr, 2011 by Melanie in content strategy, User experience, Writing
Imagine, if you will, a conversation:
Joe: Hey Sam, can you take a look at this new form for our website? I need your wordsmithing expertise.
Sam: Sure, buddy.
Joe: Great. Here are my questions. Should “Shipping Policy” be capitalized in “Read our Shipping Policy for more details”? Also, should we italicize it, since it’s name of a page? Or use double quotation marks?
Sam: Great questions, pal! Hmm, let’s see. (Clicks around to a few online authorities.) Looks like this expert recommends downstyle—so let’s capitalize “Shipping,” but not “policy.” And this other expert suggests we use bolding instead of italics. Does that help?
Joe: Yes! Thank you! I knew you’d know where to find the answers.
Sam: Sure thing, chum. But—hang on. I see a line on this form I don’t completely understand. “Enter whirligig code for cretacious widget.” What does that mean?
Joe: (Shrugs.) I dunno. The developer put it in there, so I figure it’s there for a reason. (Walks away.)
Sam: (Scratches head.)
Wow, you’re thinking. What an odd exchange! That wouldn’t happen in real life. It’s so silly.
And yet. And yet.
It happens to me far too often. A client or co-worker will express great concern over a fine detail like punctuation, and complete obliviousness to huge problems with readability and coherence. I see both writers and non-writers do this.
Our obsession with syntax
Of course, I’m familiar with the idea of folks being consumed by a passion for syntax. I am those folks, after all. I’m a punctuation obsessive. I’ve read Eats, Shoots, and Leaves.
Then, a month ago, I really took notice.
In my SXSW presentation on March 11, as I spoke about how non-writers can get better at writing, I showed some examples of what I think is pretty decent web copy written by designers. A couple of the examples had typos in them. I didn’t think it was a big deal.
Some in my audience disagreed.
One woman took me aside afterward and strongly cautioned me against such syntactical insouciance. “It destroys credibility!” she said. Others said the same thing via Twitter.
What I’m not saying
Look, anyone who knows me at all knows there’s nothing I love better than a good grammar debate. I wrote an entire blog post about how typos make you look like a hack. I freaked out when a co-worker innocently declared that a period should always precede two spaces. I have a long history of sticking up for the serial comma.
I’m not saying that punctuation and grammar don’t matter. For goodness’ sake. As if we needed web content to be messier.
I’m just saying it’s not the most important thing. And sometimes, we treat it as if it is.
Leave those deck chairs alone; the boat is sinking
I know you don’t want to hear this. But I’m going to say it anyway:
- When was the last time you were really confused by a misplaced comma?
- When was the last time you saw a hyphen instead of an em-dash, and you left the site in frustration?
- When was the last time a missing Oxford comma cost you money?
For me, the answer is “not recently, if ever.”
Now,
- When was the last time unclear writing confused you, and you left the site in frustration?
- When was the last time you couldn’t understand what a web form was asking for?
- When was the last time you couldn’t find a web page because the site’s navigation was poorly labeled?
Was it last week? Yesterday? This morning? Five minutes ago? Because if I know anything, it’s that those of us who spend any time on the web have these problems daily.
Daily.
Why do we do this? Why do we argue about leading, apostrophes, and Comic Sans, when we don’t even understand what our words are trying to communicate?
1. We do it because it’s easy
For us word-nerdy types, it’s easy to remember the rules in English that govern apostrophes. Simple. Black and white. We see a sign that says “Kellys’ Bakery” and we snicker because our brains instantly recognize the error.
What’s more, these missteps annoy us because we can’t turn off the spellchecker in our brains. So when we see a typo, we jump on it. We shout defiantly, “This represents everything that’s wrong in the world!”
We think if we could enforce typographic correctness everywhere then maybe, just maybe, in this messy, disappointing, scary, unpredictable life, something would be perfect, beautiful, and orderly.
2. We do it because it feeds our egos
Not everyone is like us. Some folks can’t remember the rules about apostrophes. Some don’t know what an em-dash is. Heck, some of these people never even diagrammed a sentence in school.
But we have! We know all this stuff! Sure, maybe our six-figure humanities degrees and hours analyzing Joyce and Faulkner go unappreciated in this world of $2 blog posts. But goshdarnit, we know how to use a semicolon. We deserve recognition!
3. We do it because the alternative is difficult and messy
What is a “cretacious widget”? What would our readers call it? Does it need a place on the form? Should it go in its current spot, or somewhere else on the form? Is there anything the form isn’t explaning, that it should?
These are hard questions. They require us to push through the cognitive discomfort of knowing there’s a question that needs asking, but not knowing what it is. They require meticulous research and systematic questioning. They require us to look stupid by asking some engineer what cretacious means. Sometimes, more than one engineer.
And yet, these questions must be dealt with.
Do the right thing, not the easy thing
When we’re really doing our jobs, we’re more than the keepers of commas. We’re the “finders of lost users,” as Clay Delk has said.
We’re communicators.
Yes, typographical correctness has value. But let’s spend less time arguing about the finer points of correct punctuation, typography, spelling, and grammar, and more time advocating for the user. You know, the guy who buys things from us. Or would, if he could find and understand them.
It’s time to step out of the world of black and white answers: italics here, caps there, bold here, single-space there.
It’s time to spend a little less time arguing about how many ellipses can dance on the head of a pin, and more time thinking like the user who is not, in fact, proofreading our writing, but who is actually trying to understand what it’s saying.








Rob Croll
22. Apr, 2011
Eats, Shoots and Leaves may (embarrassingly enough) be one of my favorite books. And, like you, I too have been known to obsess about punctuation and grammar. (My teenage daughter, however, is even worse. She’s gone so far as to edit – and return – a heartwarming year-in-review birthday note from her mother.)
But, like you, I agree that we can sometimes lose sight of what we’re really trying to accomplish with this degree of linguistic perfection.
We also forget that those misplaced apostrophes are probably completely invisible to the average (non-punctuation-obsessive) reader. So, while we may want writers to believe it damages their credibility for their grammar to be less than perfect, that’s probably only true for a relatively small sliver of their readership.
Clay
22. Apr, 2011
YES.
So frustrating to send copy out for review and get nothing but grammar (sometimes even *correct* grammar) edits, and nothing about the actual content. Especially when I’m forced to make up half the content, and am waiting for someone to give me real details.
Those details? Inevitably come in the first full review of design and programming. Instead of design and programming edits.
Well said!
(and thanks for the callout!)
Ryan
22. Apr, 2011
I completely agree on small errors that most will not even notice.
I disagree on large typos like misspelled words. I believe that this conveys two things to the reader…
1) The quality of this website is questionable if they don’t even take time to run spell check.
2) This website must not be very popular as users have not emailed to let the webmaster know.
A bad website that nobody visits … hmm
Melanie
22. Apr, 2011
@Rob – Agree. And about the birthday letter – OUCH.
@Clay – Totally feel that. I hate getting drafts back with only comments on punctuation! Grr.
@Ryan – There’s really no way around the risk to credibility that typos pose. So you make a good point. Ideally we’d have both perfect clarity and perfect syntax. But if it’s a tradeoff, I’d take clarity first.
Jo
25. Apr, 2011
I’m not sure I understand the point of this article. Are you – as a professional writer – seriously saying we shouldn’t worry about typos?
The very least a professional writer should do is make sure all copy is clear, readable and talks to the target audience AND is grammatically correct, conform to a house style and uses correct spelling.
It’s not a question of trading one against the other – they are both essential parts of the writer or editor’s job.
Jameson
26. Apr, 2011
You’ve stated the case elegantly and I completely agree. However, maybe a better title would be “Keep obsessing about typos – but obsess more about clear, accessible language.” There’s no reason we can’t do both – unless we’re just digging up typos to score petty ego points, in which case why bother?
Joan
26. Apr, 2011
Your article just may have delivered me from the curse of grammar hypersenitivity. Everything I read and everything I hear I critique for frammar and punctuation. Even as I read this article, I caught little things, like unnecessary hypens, until I finally got it. Let it go! Except for misspells. Let’s show some intelligence. It just may teach the user how to spell a word today
Cliff Tyllick
26. Apr, 2011
Absolutely right. Get the big stuff first.
A similar situation is to keep working on your home page when your site analytics show that hardly anybody who uses your site hits it.
No point repainting the front door when everyone’s trying to come in through the back, getting lost in the warehouse, and then leaving without whatever they came to you for.
Find your site’s actual pain points and work on fixing them.
Matthew Grocki
28. Apr, 2011
It comes down to knowing your audience. If you are in a retail site, users are skimming 75% of your content to get to your price, pictures, checkout. They are not grammarians.
While it may not be as black and white as writers vs non-writers viewing content, we must focus on, and not ignore the fact, that most people are not reading what we wright. They are skimming it to get to where they need to go.
People pick on typos because it empowers them and then immediately feel a sense of authority over the author. 9 times out of 10 they need to get over themselves.
I loved the tenor and point of this article. Refreshing take.
Thank you.